Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Motorola One Power, having a score of 81 against 75.7. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola One Power has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features and better performance. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an older cellphone than Motorola One Power, but Samsung could make it a little lighter and noticeably thinner anyway.
Motorola One Power counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a little greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2246 resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Power counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a back camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution, the Motorola One Power also has a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos. Galaxy C9 Pro features as much storage to install applications and games as the Motorola One Power one, they have equal 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola One Power counts with improved battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.