Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola One Power, getting a score of 77.8 against 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and performance enhancements. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit heavier than Motorola One Power, it's a lot thinner and also newer.
Motorola One Power has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Motorola One Power, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger screen and a quite better number of pixels in each inch in the display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola One Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola One Power, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a way better video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Power, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.