Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. Motorola One Vision's construction is much newer than the Google Nexus 6P's, but it's somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Motorola One Vision counts with just a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One Vision also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen. Motorola One Vision counts with a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a back camera with much more megapixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
Google Nexus 6P features a battery duration that is just as good as the Motorola One Vision one, although the Google Nexus 6P has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.