Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. The Google Pixel 2 body is a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola One Vision, even though it was released about 19 months before. Google Pixel 2 features a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola One Vision has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger aperture for better low-light images and video and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola One Vision counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 30 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.