Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-05-15 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's overall score of 80.7. Google Pixel XL is a just a little lighter phone than Motorola One Vision, but both are 0.34inches thick. The Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola One Vision counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision features a bit better processor than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Vision also has 4 more processing cores.
Motorola One Vision captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations and a bigger sensor.
Google Pixel XL features a battery life that's very similar to the Motorola One Vision one, although the Google Pixel XL has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.