Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola One Vision, having a general score of 83.7 against 80.7. Although the LG V50 ThinQ and the Motorola One Vision were released only a few months apart, the LG V50 ThinQ construction is a little bit heavier but also a little thinner than the Motorola One Vision.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a little bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite higher display density. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Vision takes much better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.