Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 80.7 score against 76.4. Even though Motorola One Vision is a bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and also a lot newer. Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola One Vision captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera with much more megapixels, higher 30 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Motorola One Vision features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.