Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. Motorola One Vision's design is incredibly newer and way thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it's also just a little bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Motorola One Vision features a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.