Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than the Motorola One Vision, with an 81.2 score against 80.7. Motorola Edge 50 is a just a bit thinner phone than Motorola One Vision, but both of them have equal weights. The Motorola One Vision has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 features a brighter display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a bit higher 1220 x 2712px resolution, a quite greater number of pixels in each inch of display and a quite bigger screen. Motorola One Vision has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.