Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A12's 80.3 score. The Motorola One Vision design is just a little thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A12, even though it was released about 20 months before. Galaxy A12 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One Vision counts with a much better display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a way higher amount of pixels per display inch. The Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A12, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A12 has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. Motorola One Vision captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.