Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 435 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, with a global score of 84.7 against 80.7. The Galaxy A32 body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola One Vision. Motorola One Vision has a little better processing power than Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Motorola One Vision has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixel density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2520px. Motorola One Vision has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a 48 mega-pixels back camera and the same video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.