Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, getting a general score of 82.3 against 80.7. The Galaxy A60 body is a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Motorola One Vision, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola One Vision also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A60, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A60's CPU is very similar to Motorola One Vision's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola One Vision has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. Motorola One Vision has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.