Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is better than Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G design is newer and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision's, but it's also a bit heavier. Galaxy A71 5G has a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher screen density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with improved battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.