Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-15 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, getting a global score of 82.1 against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's design is just a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the Motorola One Vision, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. The Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola One Vision also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a just a bit better screen pixel density.
Motorola One Vision features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A8 Star counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A8 Star also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy A8 Star features just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.