Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Motorola One Vision is a way older and much thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola could make it lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola One Vision has a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with a better resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 63 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.