Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom, having an 84.5 score against 80. Even though Apple iPhone XS Max is older and a bit heavier than Motorola One Zoom, it's body is still thinner. The iPhone XS Max has a sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688, a bit larger screen and a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
IPhone XS Max features a quite better performance than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Motorola One Zoom has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with improved battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom features a superior camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Zoom. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola One Zoom, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.