Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, with an 80.3 score against 80. Google Nexus 6P's body is just a little lighter and thinner than Motorola One Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a processor that is just as good as the Motorola One Zoom one, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen. Motorola One Zoom takes better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations, a bigger sensor capturing better quality pictures and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom has a little longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Zoom, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.