Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 general score. Although Google Pixel 2 is older than Motorola One Zoom, it's construction is notably lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 2 has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Motorola One Zoom takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Motorola One Zoom features a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.