Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, having an 81.3 score against 80. The Google Pixel XL is an noticeably older phone than Motorola One Zoom, but Google was able to make it lighter and a little thinner anyway. Google Pixel XL counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Zoom also has 4 more CPU cores. Motorola One Zoom takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video, a bigger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 128 GB. Motorola One Zoom features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Zoom. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.