Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2019-09-05 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the LG V20, getting a global score of 80 against 77. Motorola One Zoom's body is a lot newer than LG V20's, but it is thicker and just a bit heavier. Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a higher number of cores.
LG V20 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger aperture, a lot more megapixels camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V20 has a better memory for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One Zoom has longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V20, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.