Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's general score of 80. LG V50 ThinQ is a a little thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than the Motorola One Zoom, even when they were released with only 4 months difference. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixel density.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery performance in Motorola One Zoom. Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.