Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. Motorola One Zoom's body is noticeably newer and thinner, but a little heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
Motorola Droid Turbo features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Zoom counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that holds up to 128 GB.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity. Motorola One Zoom captures better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot more megapixels camera, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a larger camera aperture.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.