Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 score. Motorola One Zoom is a noticeably newer and extremely thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is just a little bit heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo has a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola One Zoom shoots better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture, better video frame rate and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola One Zoom has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 128 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, else you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.