Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Motorola One Zoom's construction is a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker and was released about a year before. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a greater pixel density.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit more storage for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.