Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is just a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a global score of 80.3 against 80. Samsung Galaxy A12 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola One Zoom, but both are equally thin. Galaxy A12 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Motorola One Zoom has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution camera, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Galaxy A12 features slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A12 features greater battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.