Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-09-05 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Motorola One Zoom, with an 84.7 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer cellphone than Motorola One Zoom, but it's just a little thicker and a little bit heavier. The Motorola One Zoom features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A32's processor is very similar to the Motorola One Zoom one, both of them have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM. The Motorola One Zoom shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a 48 MP back facing camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger aperture.
The Galaxy A32 features a slightly better memory for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 features superior battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.