Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting an 81 score against 80. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is way thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola One Zoom, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Motorola One Zoom has a slightly better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and Motorola One Zoom both count with really similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a greater amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola One Zoom has a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery duration is just as good as the Motorola One Zoom one. Motorola One Zoom shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.