Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 450.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 80 score against 77.8. Even though the Motorola One Zoom is notably older and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a bigger display and a little higher display pixel density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Motorola One Zoom not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.