Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than Motorola One's 74.3 overall score. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, the LG V50 ThinQ is an a bit thicker and heavier phone than Motorola One. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ features a much sharper display than Motorola One, because it has a lot better pixel quantity per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Motorola One, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture. LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola One, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features improved battery duration than Motorola One, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.