Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola One, getting a overall score of 81 against 74.3. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy C9 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy C9 Pro body is thinner than the Motorola One, although it is heavier and was released about 21 months before.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One, because it has a bit larger display, a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a higher pixel amount in each screen inch. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to Motorola One's one, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro and Motorola One have really similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola One has just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy C9 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.