Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 311.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola One, getting a 77.8 score against 74.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is heavier than the Motorola One, it's notably thinner and noticeably newer.
The Motorola One counts with a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Motorola One, because it has a way bigger display, a way higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Motorola One, because it has a much better video resolution, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola One, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.