Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.90 x 1.90 x 0.90 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 4.00 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 100 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 135 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Cricket CAPTR has a general score of 27.9, which is better than the Motorola P280's 24.1 score. The Cricket CAPTR design is thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola P280. Cricket CAPTR's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Motorola P280, both of them have the same number of cores.
The Cricket CAPTR has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola P280, because it has a better 160 x 128px resolution. The Cricket CAPTR's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as Motorola P280's one. The Cricket CAPTR has a much longer battery duration than Motorola P280.
The Cricket CAPTR shoots greater pictures and videos than Motorola P280.
Cricket CAPTR and the Motorola P280 cost exactly the same, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.