Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-07-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.98 x 2.60 x 0.54 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 220 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is way better than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE's global score of 57.9. The Google Pixel 4 body is a lot newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE. Google Pixel 4 has a greater hardware performance than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a way better 1080 x 2280 resolution, a way bigger display and a lot better display pixel density. The Google Pixel 4 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, although it has no external memory slot.
The Google Pixel 4 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a lot better video definition and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Google Pixel 4 costs a little more money than the Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.