Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-07-26 | 2020-04-29 |
| 4.98 x 2.60 x 0.54 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, having a general score of 90.8 against 57.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE has Android 4.1 version. Galaxy A51 5G's design is notably newer and notably thinner than the Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE's, but it's also just a bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater performance than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a way larger screen and a lot greater display density.
Galaxy A51 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a back facing camera with way more MP and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much longer battery life than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 1785mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a bit more money than the Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.