Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-07-26 | 2019-05-16 |
| 4.98 x 2.60 x 0.54 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 220 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, with a score of 93.6 against 57.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G design is noticeably newer and extremely thinner than the Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE's, although it is heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE has Android 4.1.
Galaxy S10 5G features a much better display than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a way greater screen pixel density, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a lot bigger display. Galaxy S10 5G has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, although it has no slot for an external memory card.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a superior performance than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has more cores and 7 GB more RAM. Galaxy S10 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a lot better video definition and a camera in the back with much more MP. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 1785mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a little more than Motorola Photon Q 4G LTE, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.