Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2011-08-30 | 2020-04-04 |
| 4.70 x 2.44 x 0.46 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 3.99 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1079.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| 258 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Yes | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 312 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than Motorola PRO+, with an 80.1 score against 52.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola PRO+ has Android 2.3. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is a lot newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola PRO+.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better looking screen than Motorola PRO+, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a way larger display and a lot greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola PRO+, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much powerful CPU than Motorola PRO+, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola PRO+, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better 12 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola PRO+, because it has a 181% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro costs a little more than Motorola PRO+, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.