Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is much better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting an 85 score against 75.2. Apple iPhone 8's design is much lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it is just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Apple iPhone 8 has just a little better processing power than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has lesser cpu cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone 8 features a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a much smaller display, a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a lot worse 750 x 1334px resolution. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a greater camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with lot less mega pixels and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video.
The iPhone 8 counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 8 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.