Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), with an 81.6 score against 75.2. Google Pixel 2's design is notably lighter than Motorola razr (2019), but it's somewhat thicker and was released 2 years before. Google Pixel 2's processing unit is very similar to Motorola razr (2019)'s processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 2 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 1920. Google Pixel 2 counts with as much memory to store more games and applications as the Motorola razr (2019) one, they have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 2 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower video resolution. Google Pixel 2 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.