Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than Motorola razr (2019), getting a overall score of 79.1 against 75.2. Even though the LG V30 is a lot older and a little thicker than the Motorola razr (2019), it's design is still incredibly lighter. The LG V30 has a much better display than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater display pixels density.
The LG V30 features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola razr (2019), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The LG V30 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the LG V30 also has a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
LG V30 has superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V30 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.