Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is better than Motorola razr (2019)'s global score of 75.2. LG V50 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter than the Motorola razr (2019), although it is somewhat thicker and was released only 9 months before. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a little bit larger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Motorola razr (2019). Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG V50 ThinQ features much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes greater videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.