Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2020-02-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 373 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than Motorola razr (2019)'s score of 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and Motorola razr (2019) counts with Android 10 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body weights the same than Motorola razr (2019), but it's noticeably thicker.
Motorola razr (2019) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2019) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2019) has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels.
The Galaxy A32 features a much better camera than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 has a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.