Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is way better than the Motorola razr (2019)'s overall score of 75.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a more recent 11 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple additional features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is just a little bit lighter but thicker than Motorola razr (2019), and they were released only 4 months apart.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola razr (2019). They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a little bit larger display, a quite higher screen pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A71 5G shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a really longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.