Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-06 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2019), having an 81 score against 75.2. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body has the same thickness than the Motorola razr (2019), but it is a little bit lighter.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 876 x 2142 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch and a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2019), because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola razr (2019) features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 59 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much better camera than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the same video frame rate and the same resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.