Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black and White |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2019), having a global score of 77.8 against 75.2. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is way newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than Motorola razr (2019). These phones have Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Motorola razr (2019) has Android 10.
The Motorola razr (2019) counts with a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a quite higher pixel amount in each inch of display, a bigger screen and a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage for games and applications than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2510mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs more than Motorola razr (2019), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola razr (2019). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola razr (2019), and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.