Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-02-06 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.77 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blush gold and Noir black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1500.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Motorola razr (2019), getting a general score of 85.5 against 75.2. Although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older and a lot thicker than the Motorola razr (2019), it's body is still lighter. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2246 resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola razr (2019), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola razr (2019), because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2019), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2510mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures way better videos and photos than Motorola razr (2019), although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back, a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in low light situations and a lower video definition.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.