Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL's overall score of 81.3. The Motorola razr (2020) design is a lot newer and a little thinner than Google Pixel XL's, although it is also somewhat heavier. Google Pixel XL counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Google Pixel XL features better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3450mAh battery size.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations and a bigger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.