Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting an 87 score against 76.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Motorola razr (2020) body is a lot newer and noticeably thinner, but also just a little heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo has a superior battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 39 percent greater battery size.
Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low-light environments, a much better resolution back-facing camera and faster 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.