Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola razr (2020) design is extremely newer and thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it is just a little heavier.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit faster CPU than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola razr (2020) features a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much more megapixels back facing camera, better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 39% more battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.