Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a global score of 87 against 81. These devices come with Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is notably newer, but a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 876 x 2142 resolution, it also counts with a little greater screen density and a little larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photos, a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.