Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2142 x 876 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 global score. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is newer and thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, but it's also just a little heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit faster processor than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better screen than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a quite greater display density and a bit higher 1080 x 2246px resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.